Legal Opinion
Abrams & Wofsy v. Renaissance Inv. Corp.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided March 12, 1993No. Civ. 1:87-cv-1931-WCO, 1:87-cv-1962-WCO, 1:87-cv-2074-WCO and 1:87-cv-2454-WCOPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
O’KELLEY, Chief Judge.
From January 21,1992 to May 7,1992, this court conducted the nonjury trial of the consolidated Abrams & Wofsy, Pignatelli, Ache-car, and Pendleton cases (“the Renaissance cases”). At trial, the plaintiffs and defen dants KPMG Peat Marwick and Jerry F. Humphries (collectively “Peat Marwick”) presented evidence relevant to the Abrams & Wofsy, Pignatelli, and Pendleton plaintiffs’ claims of fraud and negligence brought pursuant to (1) section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5,17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (hereinafter “section…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. ZweifelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Patel v. PatelDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011