Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Walmart, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 14, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00392Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE LANEMA BRUCE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 3:21-cv-392-JEM ) WALMART, INC., WALMART ASSOCIATES, ) and WALMART STORE #1319, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Rule 73(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the consent of the parties, for all further proceedings including entry of judgment [Doc. 12]. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. There is complete diversity between the parties and the amount in controversy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API