Legal Opinion
Cleary v. Daniels
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 1917No. 3063PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Fourth District; Hon. A. B. Morgan, Judge. Action by M. J. Cleary against Amelia Daniels, wherein the Price River Irrigation Company intervened. Decree for defendant and intervener. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.
Plaintiff’s counsel, in their abstract, give a correct synopsis of the allegations of the complaint in the following words:
“The complaint alleged that plaintiff was and is the owner of the north half of the southeast quarter and the north half of the southwest quarter of section 25, township 10 south, of range 7 east, Utah County, Utah.
“That there is a small spring of water on this land which plaintiff at considerable expense had diverted to his house for domestic use.
“That on the 23d day of June, 1915, defendant wrongfully entered upon said land and destroyed plaintiff’s ditch and means of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Green River Canal Co. v. ThaynUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Beecher v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Albion-Idaho Land Co. v. Naf Irr. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Richfield Cottonwood Irr. Co. v. City of RichfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Cleary v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.