Legal Opinion
Crowley v. Muskie
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 22, 1980No. Civ. A. 74-494PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AUBREY E. ROBINSON, Jr., District Judge.
The instant action has had a long and troubled history. In 1974 Plaintiffs brought a class action suit, claiming that Defendants placed Plaintiffs in “overcomplement” status, thus depriving them of their rights as Civil Service employees. On June 24, 1977, in a Memorandum Opinion and Order, this Court granted partial Summary Judgment to Plaintiffs. The only issues remaining after the issuance of the 1977 Opinion were (1) what individuals were placed in overcomplement status, and (2) what relief is appropriate to those individuals.
On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arthur C. Payne, Cross-Appellee v. Panama Canal Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States of America v. Colin C. McInnes and Cross-Appellants (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crowley v. ShultzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- George Shultz, Secretary of State v. James D. CrowleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Hobson v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- George Shultz, Secretary of State v. James D. CrowleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- George Shultz, Secretary of State v. James D. CrowleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.