George Shultz, Secretary of State v. James D. Crowley
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentMacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge
In a class action against the State Department, Crowley, et al., prevailed on their claim that the Department had improperly abolished certain positions. They now seek attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “Act”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1982 & 1985 Supp.).1 The effective date of the Act is October 1, 1981, and our decision in Nichols v. Pierce, 740 F.2d 1249 (D.C.Cir.1984), prohibits attorney fee awards under the Act if the only matters “pending” on October 1, 1981 relate solely to attorney fees. Thus this case turns on whether the case was “pending” with respect to any matters…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.