Legal Opinion
McCormick v. Cupp
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 2003No. WD 60508, WD 60509PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.
This appeal stems from a recent statutory provision that allows the judicial dissolution of a corporation with two equal shareholders who are unable to agree on the desirability of continuing the business of the corporation. Paraphrased, Section 351.467, RSMo 2000, 1 enacted in 1999, and set out in full in the Appendix to this opinion, provides: Where a corporation is owned equally by two shareholders, and when either of them can show the shareholders cannot agree as to continuing the business, then that shareholder can petition the circuit court to dispose of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Carter v. St. John's Regional Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Mulco Products, Inc. v. BlackSupreme Court of Delaware · 1956
- Evans v. WerleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Kan. City v. CosicMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Advanced Telecommunications Network, Inc. v. Allen (In Re Advanced Telecommunications Network, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Reyner v. CrawfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. CokeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- APAC-Missouri, Inc. v. BoyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.