Rosenzweig v. Wood

The plaintiff obtained a warrant of attachment against the defendant on the ground that the latter was a nonresident of this State. The defendant moves to set aside the attachment for the reason that she is a resident of this city, and *298was at the time the attachment was obtained, and has been ever since July, 1898, and that her husband has also been a resident of this city since May, 1899. The defendant introduces a number of affidavits showing that defendant lived at Ho. 309 West Twenty-second street in this city, from July, 1898, to May, 1899, and at Ho. 203 West Twenty-third street in this…