Legal Opinion

Walton v. Chadwick

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided December 23, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term. Action by Alfred Walton against Helen E. Chadwick. From an order denying a motion to vacate the attachment, defendant

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate an attachment. The action is brought to recover the sum of $1,133.33, which the plaintiff loaned to the defendant, and which the defendant agreed to repay, with interest. 60 days after date of the loan, which time had expired before the commencement of the action, and payment of said loan was duly demanded, and refused. The answer of defendant sets up the defense of usury. The warrant of attachment was granted upon the complaint, and the affidavits of the plaintiff and Pierre C. Talman, a practicing lawyer of this city. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. WigtonNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Lowenstein v. SalingerNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenzweig v. WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API