Butts v. Comr. of IRS
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
These two appeals by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, consolidated for oral argument, involve the appropriate tax treatment to be given to the arrangement of the taxpayers as agents selling life, automobile, fire, and other types of insurance for Allstate Insurance Company. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue contends they should be treated as employees. The taxpayers successfully contended in the United States Tax Court that they are independent contractors. We affirm.
These cases were heard and appealed separately from the decisions of different Tax Court judges, but the controlling…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Butts v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
- Smithwick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
3Cited by14 opinions
- John Weary v. William S. CochranCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Albert and Helen R. Ware v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- United States v. StinsonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.