Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided April 29, 2009No. 01-1965, 03-1717PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREENE, Chief Judge:
These consolidated cases present the questions of whether, under 38 U.S.C. § 7263, the Court has jurisdiction to review the fee agreements between appellants Deborah J. Jackson and Thomas W. Kelly and their counsel Kenneth M. Carpenter and, if so, (1) whether Mr. Carpenter is required to offset that portion of the Court’s award of fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), granted for work performed on behalf of Ms. Jackson before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) against the 30% contingency fee…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Wells v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Darald G. Bly v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2016
- Carroll B. Westfall v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2015
- Clara Sue Padgett v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- Clara Sue Padgett v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- Darald G. Bly v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2016