Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Clara Sue Padgett v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided December 16, 2009No. 02-2259(E)Published

1ConcurrenceKasold, Judge

I write separately to note that Mrs. Padgett did not appeal the Court’s decision *314denying her substitution in the underlying merits appeal, and that decision therefore became final. See Jackson v. Shinseki, 23 Vet.App. 27, 31 (2009) (mandate of the Court is “evidence that a judgment has become final” (quoting U.S. Vet.App. R. 41)); Kiddey v. Shinseki 22 Vet.App. 367, 370 (2009) (applications for EAJA fees must be submitted to the Court “within thirty days of final judgment in the action” (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B))); see also Padgett v. Peake, 22 Vet.App. 159, 168-69 (2008) (Kasold,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Barney O. Padgett v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
  4. Jackson v. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
  5. Robert J. Kiddey v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API