Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Whan
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of the City and County of Denver. Eon. Peter L. Palmer, Judge. Action by James A. Wban against The Denver & Eio Grande Eailroad Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
Appellee was employed hy the Pullman company as conductor of the sleeping car “Toltec.” This car was attached to* a train being operated by appellant, and was derailed and partially overturned, whereby appellee was injured. He brought suit against appellant, to recover damages for the injuries sustained. There* was* judgment in his favor, from which the defendant appeals.
Many errors are assigned on the rulings of the court at the trial, but a determination of the questions presented for consideration by the rulings of the trial court on the demurrer to the second defense dispose of this*…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. HamlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Barker v. Colorado Reg.-Sports Car Club of Am., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- Perry v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
- State v. AscarateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
- Lindsay v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.