Legal Opinion

The Eugene

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1898No. 430PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Washington.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant is claimant of the steamboat Eugene, and brings this appeal from the decree of the court below against the steamboat and in favor of the libelants and of Walter M. Cary, Fred M. Lyons, and Edward J, Knight, named in the decree as interveners, each in the sum of $800, and directing that a writ of venditioni exponas issue against the vessel to satisfy the decree, with costs. Exceptions t.o the original libel having been sustained (83 Fed. 222), the libel was amended. As amended, it alleges, in substance, that the defendant Portland & Alaska Trading &…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Hill v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Gilfillan v. McKeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Withenbury v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Todd Shipyards Corporation v. the City of AthensDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1949
  2. The S. L. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1902
  3. The Thomas P. SheldonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1902
  4. The BellaDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1899
  5. Osaka Shosen Kaisha v. Pacific Export Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API