Legal Opinion

Maudine B. Smith v. Horace Mann Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 29, 1983No. 83-7017PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Appellant, Maudine B. Smith, an administrative principal in the Muscle Shoals school system, appeals the judgment of the district court limiting the amount of her recovery for attorney’s fees to $1,000 and granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, Horace Mann Insurance Company, on her claim of bad faith refusal to pay. Alabama law governs this diversity action.

Appellant claims that she is entitled to $15,758.00 in attorney’s fees, the actual cost of legal representation in her successful defense of an action by a former Muscle Shoals school principal, Charles L. Carter, who claimed that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chavers v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Sexton v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Employers Ins. Co. of Ala., Inc. v. Jeff Gin Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Billups v. Ala. Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lampliter Dinner Theater, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Epolito v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
  3. Quesada v. Director, Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Associated Scrap Metal, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1995
  5. Chesapeake Ship Propeller Co. v. StickneyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API