Legal Opinion

Anderlohr v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDi Giovanna, J.

In this action petitioner was injured on April 8, 1951. On May 1, 1951, she wrote a letter to the corporation counsel and he duly acknowledged receipt thereof on May 11, 1951. The notice was not sent by registered mail and was not sworn to. Nevertheless on October 24, 1951, the comptroller duly proceeded to have the petitioner examined pursuant to law and petitioner subsequently signed, swore to and returned the original of the testimony to the comptroller by letter dated November 19, 1951. Petitioner is sixty-five years of age and not in the best of health and her husband was seriously ill…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re MillanNew York Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. SchusterCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1975
  3. Adkins v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Harwood v. City of HornellNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Soules v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API