Legal Opinion

People v. Schuster

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided October 14, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoel J. Tyler, J.

The defendant is charged with three violations of subdivision (a) of section 120 of article 11 of the New York City Traffic Regulations, dated April 1, 1974, promulgated by that city’s Department of Traffic. That section, insofar as it is here applicable, reads:

"§ 120. Unauthorized operation.
"(a) No person shall operate or cause to be operated on any street a bus for the operation of which a franchise, consent, or certificate of convenience and necessity, order, or other authorization of any municipal, state, or federal authority is required, unless such franchise, consent, certificate of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Valentine v. ChrestensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Interstate Comm. Comm. v. Ill. Cent. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Maureen G.New York City Family Court · 1980
  2. In re Luis R.New York City Family Court · 1979
  3. People v. PearsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API