Legal Opinion

Diehr v. Carey and Fid. Cas. Co. of N.Y.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1945PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

— This suit was instituted by plaintiff against three defendants, to recover the sum of $845 allegedly due plaintiff for professional services rendered by him. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, two of said defendants, Albert Carey and The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, appealed. Defendant Farant Todd was let out of the ease on a demurrer to the evidence.

Plaintiff, who is a physician and surgeon, is a resident of St. Louis County. Defendant Albert Carey is a resident of Franklin County. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York is a liability insurance company, organized…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wahl v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Graham v. RingoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. State Ex Rel. Henning v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. State ex rel. Dutcher v. SheltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. State ex rel. Jackson v. BradleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Glick Ex Rel. McGinty v. Ballentine Produce Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Willey v. Fyrogas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. White v. BurkeybileSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Rakestraw v. NorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Thompson v. TerteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API