Legal Opinion
Talyansky v. Mercury Print Productions, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 19, 1998No. 6:97-cv-06517PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Victoria Talyansky (“Talyansky”), filed the instant complaint against defendant Mercury Print Productions, Inc. (“Mercury”), alleging that Mercury terminated her employment on the basis of her sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et al. (“Title VII”). 1
Pending before me is defendant’s motion to dismiss Talyansky’s complaint. For the reasons discussed, infra, defendant’s motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed.
FACTS
Talyansky was employed through a temporary agency for Mercury from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Geneva Butts v. The City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- KAREN VAN ZANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES; And Kenneth Hasan King, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Harry L. DILLMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murphy v. Board of Education of the Rochester City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Dollinger v. State Insurance FundDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Visco v. Brentwood Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014