State ex rel. Monitor Drill Co. v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
On the petition of Monitor Drill Company and William G. Young for a writ of mandamus directed to the district court for Wright county and the judge and clerk thereof, the supreme court ordered the parties named to show cause why the writ should not be issued!
1Per curiam
Application for writ of mandamus commanding the district court of Wright county to direct the files and records in a certain action to be transferred to the county of Hennepin.
Peter J. Moody brought an action in the district court of Wright county against William G. Young, sheriff of that county, and the Monitor Drill Company, to recover damages for the misuse and abuse of a civil process in the hands of Young, as sheriff, for service and execution. The Monitor Drill Company is a Minnesota corporation, with its place of residence in Plennepin county. After the commencement of the action,…
2Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ScanlonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Elcar Mobile Homes, Inc. v. DK Baxter, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Ebenezer Society v. Minnesota State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Zaremba v. KonopkaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Rosenthal v. ART METAL, INC., ETC. & GEN. DYN.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.