Legal Opinion
Morse v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 21, 1977No. 75 Civ. 3681 (WCC)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONNER, District Judge:
Defendant Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. has filed “objections” to Magistrate Raby’s Report No. 2 in the above-captioned action. Defendant challenges the Magistrate’s conclusion that, in an action brought under § 11 of the Securities Act of 1933,15 U.S.C. § 77k, the effective date of the registration statement marks the earliest point from which the applicable three-year limitations period, set forth in § 13 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77m, can begin to run. The Court confirms that conclusion for the reasons set forth below.
Very briefly, for purposes of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ingenito v. Bermec CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Osborne v. MalloryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,013 Chester Kubik v. Morton Goldfield and Albert Teller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,302 Ben Diskin v. Lomasney & Co., a Partnership, and Myron A. LomasneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. North American Research & Development Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Robert Yates v. Municipal Mortgage & EquityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- P. Stolz Family Partnership L.P. v. DaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Finkel v. Stratton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Morley v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- In Re Laser Arms Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.