Legal Opinion
State v. Panichello
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 19, 1984No. 83-11-35475 CA A33671 (Control) 83-11-35476 CA A33672 83-11-35477 CA A33673 84-02-30833 CA A33738 84-02-30834 CA A33739 84-02-30835 CA A33740PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
These six criminal cases were consolidated for appeal. Because we are obliged to examine our jurisdiction, City of Hermiston v. ERB, 280 Or 291, 570 P2d 663 (1977), and in view of our recent decision in State v. Green, 68 Or App 518, 684 P2d 575, rev den 297 Or 601 (1984), we consider it necessary to determine whether the notices of appeal are timely filed. We conclude that the notices were timely filed and that we have jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
In each of the cases, judgments of conviction were signed by the trial judge on September 20, 1984, and each judgment was “stamped” as being…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Hermiston v. Employment Relations BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State of Oregon v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Charco, Inc. v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Blackledge v. HarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Farmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- State v. WrightNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- City of Seattle v. StalsbrotenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MallickCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- State v. Superior Court of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.