Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Stalsbroten

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1999No. 66998-8PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

978 P.2d 1059 (1999)

138 Wash.2d 227

CITY OF SEATTLE, Petitioner,

v.

Loyd STALSBROTEN, Respondent.

No. 66998-8.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued March 9, 1999.

Decided June 17, 1999.

Adam Eisenberg, Seattle Law Dept. Crim. Div., Seattle, for Petitioner.

Gene M. Grantham, Seattle, for Respondent.

DURHAM, J.

This case presents the question of whether it is constitutionally permissible for a trial court to admit evidence that a drunk driving defendant refused to perform field sobriety tests. Specifically, we must determine whether admitting such evidence violates the defendant's Fifth Amendment…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  2. State v. MechamWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. McCormick v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
  4. State v. FermHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API