Legal Opinion

United States v. John Doe 1

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 27, 2020No. 18-1590(L)Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-1590(L) United States v. John Doe #1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Sofwat Khedr, Abdullah AlhumozCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Arciniega v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. Jeffrey A. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. BaldeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Roy Lewis Mercurris, Also Known as Roy RogersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API