Legal Opinion
City of Kansas City, Mo. v. Yarco Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 8, 2010No. 09-3677PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Circuit Judge.
The City of Kansas City, Missouri, sued Yarco Company, Inc., and Churchill Properties, L.P. (together “Yarco”), under federal, state, and local law, claiming that Yarco maintained a discriminatory curfew at an apartment complex. The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to Yarco. This court vacates and remands.
Yarco runs an apartment complex in Kansas City. Its lease agreement said, “CURFEW time for everyone under the age of 18 will be 8:30 p.m. nightly.” The City filed a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) alleging that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Hill v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- In re Sandpoint Cattle Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 2016
- St. Louis Heart Center, Inc. v. Nomax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Cathedral Square Partners Ltd. Partnership v. South Dakota Housing Development AuthorityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2013
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.