Legal Opinion

St. Louis Heart Center, Inc. v. Nomax, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2018No. 17-1794PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.

St. Louis Heart Center, Inc., brought a putative class action against Nomax, Inc., in Missouri state court, alleging that Nomax violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C. § 227 . The complaint alleged that Nomax transmitted twelve advertisements to the Heart Center by facsimile without including a proper opt-out notice on each advertisement. See id. § 227(b)(1)(C)(iii) ; 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200 (a)(4)(iii).

Nomax removed the case to federal court, and then moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of Article III standing. The district court ruled that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Bradley Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Craftwood II, Inc. v. Generac Power Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Robert W. Mauthe, M.D., P.C. v. MCMC LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Bais Yaakov v. Eductl. Testing ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Advanced Rehab and Medical, PC v. Amedisys Holding, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019
  5. Associated Management Services, Inc. v. Capstan Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API