Howarth v. City of New Port Richey
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION RONALD HOWARTH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:18-cv-2134-T-AAS CITY OF NEW PORT RICHEY, Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER The city of New Port Richey (the City) moves to dismiss Ronald Howarth’s fourth amended complaint. (Doc. 23). Ronald Howarth opposes the City’s motion. (Doc. 25). Because Mr. Howarth properly alleges he provided adequate notice under Florida Statute and his fourth amended complaint alleges plausible claims for relief under federal and state law, the City’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. I.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.