Legal Opinion

Howarth v. City of New Port Richey

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided August 20, 2019No. 8:18-cv-02134Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION RONALD HOWARTH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:18-cv-2134-T-AAS CITY OF NEW PORT RICHEY, Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER The city of New Port Richey (the City) moves to dismiss Ronald Howarth’s fourth amended complaint. (Doc. 23). Ronald Howarth opposes the City’s motion. (Doc. 25). Because Mr. Howarth properly alleges he provided adequate notice under Florida Statute and his fourth amended complaint alleges plausible claims for relief under federal and state law, the City’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. I.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API