Legal Opinion

Holland v. Edgerton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1987No. 8611SC1133PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

At the outset we note that the trial judge entered a final judgment on the third party claim and expressly determined in the judgment that there was “no just reason for delay” pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b). See Oestreicher v. Stores, 290 N.C. 118, 225 S.E. 2d 797 (1976).

The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether third party plaintiff Edgerton is entitled to contribution under the North Carolina version of the Uniform Contribution among Tort-Feasors Act, Chapter IB of the General Statutes, from third party defendants Funeral Home and Casket Co. for the claims…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kaleel Builders, Inc. v. AshbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Duke University v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Ferris v. HaymoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. Gregory v. Atrium Door and Window Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. In re Residential Capital, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API