Legal Opinion

Smith v. Howery

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1985No. 84-539PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morrison

Clinton and Jacqueline Howery (Howerys) appeal the May 14, 1984, order of the Fifth Judicial District Court granting respondent attorneys, Kendrick Smith, Max Hansen and W.G. Gilbert Jr.’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm the order granting summary judgment.

In February of 1979, the State of Montana filed an action in Beaverhead County seeking to condemn .76 of an acre of Howerys’ land for highway purposes. The State and Howerys were unable to agree on compensation. The Howerys therefore hired the respondents to represent them in the condemnation action.

The written retainer agreement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cereck v. Albertson's Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. West River Equipment Co. v. Holzworth Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Perez-Lizano v. AyersMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State ex rel. Department of Highways v. HoweryMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In re the Board of Street Opening & ImprovementAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. Farmers State Bank of WordenMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Smith v. HoweryMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. Shire US Holdings, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2021
  4. Weinberg v. Farmers State Bank of WordenMontana Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API