Legal Opinion

Perez-Lizano v. Ayers

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1985No. 84-296PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Milan R. Ayers appeals the May 24,1984, order of the Ninth Judicial District Court, Toole County, granting Miguel A. Perez-Lizano partial summary judgment in an action against Ayers to collect a $40,000 promissory note. The trial court judgment is affirmed.

Perez-Lizano and Ayers were in the business of developing oil and gas property. Sunlite International, Inc., of Houston, Texas, had acreage in Pondera and Teton Counties, Montana, available for development. Ayers told Perez-Lizano he was interested in purchasing an option on that acreage. Subsequently, a promissory note for $40,000 was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Higby v. HooperMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Schranz v. I. L. Grossman, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. West River Equipment Co. v. Holzworth Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Kinjerski v. LameyMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Johnson v. BondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Herzog Contracting Corporation v. McGowen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Estate of Love v. First Interstate Bank of Montana (In Re Love)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1993
  3. Niemen v. HowellMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Nordwick v. BergMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Smith v. HoweryMontana Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API