Legal Opinion

Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v. Stambaugh

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 8, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 64. — AUTION BY JOHN STAMBAUGH AND ANOTHER, AGAINST THE CUMBERLAND PIPE LINE COMPANY — Appeal from Johnson Circuit Court. A. J. Kirk, Circuit Judge. Judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner.

— Affirming.

*529In the years 1907 and 1908 appellees, John Stambaugh and E-. L. Preston, partners trading and doing business under the firm name of E. L. Preston & Co., were engaged in running and floating cross-ties down Toms creek, a navigable stream in Johnson county, Ky. Charging that appellant unlawfully obstructed Toms creek by constructing its pipé line across same, and that by reason thereof they lost about 1,600 cross-ties, appellees instituted this action against appellant to recover damages in the sum of $1,053.80. The jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green-Wheeler Shoe Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. BrownleeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  3. Cassilay v. C. P. Young & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1843
  4. Sutton v. Western Union Tel'g Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Floyd County v. Owego Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. City of Henderson v. RedmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Julius Kessler & Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API