Cassilay v. C. P. Young & Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Error to the Louisville Chancery Court. Carriers. Insurers.
1Opinion of the Court
.Judge Marshall.delivered tire opinion of the Court,
If the bill of lading, by which the shipment of the complainant’s goods on the flat boat No. 2, (Mediator,) foi delivery without delay, (perils of the river and unavoidable accidents excepted,) at Vicksburg, had contained expressly the privilege of re-shipping on good steam boats at Paducah or the mouth of the Ohio, instead of naming the mouth of Ohio aloné; still as the carriers had .undertaken to deliver the goods at Vicksburg without delay, this privilege of re-shipment, even if it had been more extensive and authorized a re-shipment…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bibb Broom Corn Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Louisville-Cincinnati Packet Co. v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v. StambaughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Sutton v. Western Union Tel'g Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Kelly v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1856