Farrar & Farrar Dairy, Inc. v. Miller-St. Nazianz, Inc.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER III, District Judge.
Named plaintiffs Farrar & Farrar Dairy, Inc. and Farrar & Farrar Farms (“named plaintiffs”) moved for class certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Defendant Miller-St. Nazianz, Inc. (“Miller” or “defendant”) responded in opposition, and named plaintiffs replied. For the reasons discussed below, named plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is denied.
I
The named plaintiffs in this action are Farrar & Farrar Dairy, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, and Farrar & Farrar Farms, a North Carolina general partnership. Second Am. Class…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Allen v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Seaberg v. Atlas Roofing Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Rose v. SLM Financial Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Abdur-Rahman v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.