Legal Opinion

Farrar & Farrar Dairy, Inc. v. Miller-St. Nazianz, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided August 25, 2008No. 5:06-CV-160-DPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES C. DEVER III, District Judge.

Named plaintiffs Farrar & Farrar Dairy, Inc. and Farrar & Farrar Farms (“named plaintiffs”) moved for class certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Defendant Miller-St. Nazianz, Inc. (“Miller” or “defendant”) responded in opposition, and named plaintiffs replied. For the reasons discussed below, named plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is denied.

I

The named plaintiffs in this action are Farrar & Farrar Dairy, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, and Farrar & Farrar Farms, a North Carolina general partnership. Second Am. Class…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
  2. Allen v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  3. Seaberg v. Atlas Roofing Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
  4. Rose v. SLM Financial Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2008
  5. Abdur-Rahman v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API