Legal Opinion
United States v. Hoover-Hankerson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 30, 2005No. CRIM. 03-188(RWR)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERTS, District Judge.
A trial jury convicted defendants Celicia Hoover-Hankerson and Benjamin Hoover of conspiracy, two counts of theft from programs receiving federal funds and two counts of fraud in the first degree. That same day, the defendants moved for and were granted a two-week extension of time under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(c)(1) to renew their motions for judgment of acquittal. Both defendants timely moved for judgment of acquittal, arguing that the government failed to produce sufficient evidence to convict them. Both defendants also…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez, United States of America v. Carlos Latorre, United States of America v. Manuel Parrilla-MarquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoover-Hankerson v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. PomrenkeDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
- United States v. Hoover-HankersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011