Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Sheldon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1828PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the Harrison Circuit Court.—Sheldon and Dixon were the plaintiffs below, and Mitchell was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Assumpsit on a promissory note for 246 dollars nnd 48 cents. Pleas, first, non-assumpsit, and issue; secondly, that the note was given upon the consideration, that the plaintiffs agreed to put up and deliver to said defendant, goods, wares, and merchandise, to the value of said sum by invoice; and the said defendant avers, that the said plaintiffs failed to de*186liver by invoice a part of said goods, wares, and merchandise, to the value of 100 dollars; which the said defendant is ready to verify. Wherefore he says, that the consideration of the note aforesaid, to the value of said goods, wares,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holeman v. LammeIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
  2. Farmer v. FairmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1839

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API