Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Fairman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Debt by Fairman against Farmer and one Cole, on a promissory note payable to Harter, and by him assigned to the plaintiff The writ was returned “not found” as to Cole, and the return was suggested on the record. Farmer pleaded three pleas. 1. Nil debet. 2. That the consideration of the note was the bargain and sale by indenture of a certain tract -of land by the payee to the defendant and Cole, in which indenture the vendor covenanted that he was' seised in fee, and had good right to sell, *258and that the land was free from incumbrances; that the plaintiff had no title, &c. 3. That the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. SheldonIndiana Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McFall v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1842

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API