Legal Opinion
DeLisle v. City of Camden
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 25, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
67 N.J. Super. 587 (1961)
171 A.2d 346
PETER DeLISLE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE CITY OF CAMDEN, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 15, 1961.
Decided May 25, 1961.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.
Mr. Joseph M. Nardi, Jr. argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Mr. Samuel L. Supnick, City Counsel, attorney).
Mr. Meyer L. Sakin argued the cause for petitioner-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.
Petitioner appealed to the State Department of Civil Service from the action of the Director of Revenue and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kilmurray v. GilfertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Barron v. GreenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Dodd v. Van RiperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- McCulloch v. HopperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amodio v. Civil Service CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Hein v. GM CONST. CO., INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- 809-811 WASHINGTON STREET ASSO. v. GregoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- PMS Realty Co. v. GuarinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Schiff v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.