Legal Opinion
Amodio v. Civil Service Commission
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 23, 1963PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
81 N.J. Super. 22 (1963)
194 A.2d 512
MICHAEL J. AMODIO, APPELLANT,
v.
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, AND TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 14, 1963.
Decided October 23, 1963.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.
Mr. Max A. Boxer argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Stewart M. Hutt, Township Attorney, argued the cause for respondent Woodbridge Township.
Miss Marilyn H. Loftus, Deputy Attorney General, appeared for respondent Civil Service…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Campbell v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Elizabeth Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HowellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Atkinson v. ParsekianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Guzman v. City of Perth AmboyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Cty. of Gloucester v. Pub. Emp. Rel. Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Gainous v. TibbetsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Goodman v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Hutchinson v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.