Hanson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment granted in favor of the defendant railway company notwithstanding a verdict for the plaintiff. The action arises out of a collision between a Budd car operated by the defendant company and an automobile driven by the plaintiff. The trial court determined that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. It is on this issue that the case is brought before us.
Our review of the record must be guided by the well-established principle that a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict accepts the view of the evidence most…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Carlson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Rintala v. Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Rogge v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gagnier v. BendixenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Gagnier v. BendixenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971