Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 8, 1963No. 38,923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment granted in favor of the defendant railway company notwithstanding a verdict for the plaintiff. The action arises out of a collision between a Budd car operated by the defendant company and an automobile driven by the plaintiff. The trial court determined that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. It is on this issue that the case is brought before us.

Our review of the record must be guided by the well-established principle that a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict accepts the view of the evidence most…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Carlson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Rintala v. Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Rogge v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gagnier v. BendixenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  2. Gagnier v. BendixenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API