Mitchell v. Union Terminal Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. F. R. Gay-noe, Judge. AotioN at law to recover damages on account of personal injury. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals .,
1Opinion of the CourtWeayeR, J.
The defendant owns, a line of railway which occupies a part of Leech street, in Sioux City. Leech street runs east and west, and is crossed at right angles by Chambers street. Approaching from the east in the direction of Chambers street, the track curves to the south, running near the curb line, and at a point several hundred feet west of the Chambers street crossing it enters an arched, doorway into a large packing house. At a point about fifty feet west of Chambers street the track is at a varying distance of eleven to twenty feet from the curb in front of a building- occupied as a poultry…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wasmer v. . Del., Lacka. and West'n R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Selover v. . CoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Ward v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Lonergan v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Deville v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TerrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Nederhiser v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Markle v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Everett v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Haven v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.