Ward v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Montgomery District Court. — Hon. N. Wo Macy, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for a personal injury. Trial by jury. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, C. J.
I. The plaintiff is a farmer, and resides on his farm, six miles southeast of the city of Red Oak. On the twelfth day of December, 1898, he was engaged in hauling straw to the city. He used two wagons. One was driven by himself, and the other by one Larson. They approached the city by the usual traveled road, which is an extension of Eighth *51street. The railroad track of the defendant crossed Eighth street within the city limits. The track is elevated above the natural surface of the street some eight or ten feet, and approaches or embankments are made on each side to enable travel to go over…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lonergan v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brownfield v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Fishburn v. Burlington & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Hoffard v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Parmenter v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Johnston v. DelanoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.