Legal Opinion

Simms v. Dept. of Health

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 30, 2020No. 20/19PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Romechia Simms v. Maryland Department of Health, et al., No. 20, September Term, 2019 DUE PROCESS — CONDITIONAL RELEASE — HOSPITAL WARRANT — DANGEROUSNESS — The legal standard for a court issuing a hospital warrant pursuant to § 3-121 of the Criminal Procedure Article of the Maryland Code (2001, 2008, 2018 Repl. Vol.) (“CP”) is whether the court has probable cause to believe that an individual violated her conditional release. Because a committed person is presumed dangerous if she violates a term of her conditional release, a separate finding of dangerousness is not required for the issuance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Piechocki v. AlamDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API