McCormick v. Shuman

Kreisher, P. J.,... The fifth reason [for judgment n. o. v.] that “the verdict is against the law” presents a more difficult question, and counsel for defendant at the oral argument stated their proposition to be “purely a question of law” and that is the reason the motion for judgment n. o. v. was not accompanied with a motion for a new trial.

*661Counsel for defendant took this same proposition when they filed their preliminary objections to plaintiffs’ complaint as their fourth objection was captioned demurrer.

It was for this reason that the court in the said opinion filed February 18, 1957, 11…