Legal Opinion

Utica Mutual Insurance v. Gruzlewski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1995No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to plaintiff insurer on the ground of lack of cooperation of its insured. The record shows that representatives of plaintiff undertook efforts that were reasonably calculated to bring about the cooperation of the insured (see, e.g., State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Imeri, 182 AD2d 683, 684). Despite those efforts, the insured willfully obstructed plaintiff s defense of the underlying litigation by refusing to turn over documents and failing to appear at an examination before trial or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Thrasher v. United States Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Evans v. International InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ImeriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Von BargenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. GUIDEONE SPECIALTY v. Congregation Bais YisroelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. Wingates, LLC v. Commonwealth Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  3. Utica Mutual Insurance v. GruzlewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API