United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Von Bargen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Action by an insurer for a judgment ' declaring that its disclaimer of liability under a policy of automobile liability insurance is proper and that it is not obligated to defend the named insured, Herman von Bargén, and his son, Edgar von Bargén, in actions brought against them or to pay any judgments which may be recovered against them in such actions, and for other relief. The insurer appeals from a judgment entered after trial declaring that its disclaimer is improper arid that it is obligated under the contract to defend the actions and pay judgments recovered therein. Judgment reversed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Shafer v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Ohrbach v. Preferred Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Albert v. Public Service Mutual Casualty Ins. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Car and General Insurance Corp. v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. LingleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. GruzlewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Government Employees Insurance v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.