Legal Opinion
Stoelting v. Hauck
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 30, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
56 N.J. Super. 386 (1959)
153 A.2d 339
THOMAS STOELTING, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ANTHONY M. HAUCK, JR., AND VIRGINIA HAUCK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND SANDRA HAUCK, BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOHN HAUCK, II, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 13, 1959.
Decided June 30, 1959.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.
Mr. Allen C. Mathias argued the cause for defendants-appellants, Anthony M. Hauck, Jr. and Virginia Hauck (Messrs. Smith, James and Mathias, attorneys).
Mr. C. Ryman Herr, Jr. argued the cause for defendant-appellant, Sandra Hauck (Messrs.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Bacak v. HogyaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Hartman v. City of BrigantineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Hulsey v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Hendrikson v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDonald v. Home Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Linn v. RandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Hetherton v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Piscataway Tp. Bd. of Ed. v. CaffieroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Convery v. MacZkaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978