Legal Opinion
Convery v. MacZka
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 30, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
163 N.J. Super. 411 (1978)
394 A.2d 1250
WILLIAM C. CONVERY, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JEROME CONVERY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RICHARD MACZKA AND LOUISE MACZKA AND JUDITH CONVERY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided October 30, 1978.
Mr. Bernard H. Shihar for plaintiff (Messrs. Gussis & Shihar, attorneys).
Mr. Richard D. Millet for defendants Maczka (Messrs. Hampson & Millet, attorneys).
Mr. John J. Shannon for defendant Judith Convery (Messrs. Purcell, Ries & Shannon, attorneys).
FURMAN, J.S.C.
On defendant Judith Convery's motion for summary judgment what survives of a tort…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Holodook v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- France v. A. P. A. Transport Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Stoelting v. HauckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foldi v. JeffriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Carey v. DavisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Buono v. ScaliaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Foldi v. JeffriesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981