Legal Opinion

Burgess v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1927No. 10342Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

As one of his grounds for a rehearing, appellant earnestly insists that his bill of exception No. 14 clearly manifests error. Appellant states the question presented by the bill in the following language: “Now the question pre sented in this bill is: That the state offered those tax reports showing the receipt of the money as an admission on the part of the defendant, which was proper and right, but when defendant replied that those reports you offer were made up from stubs placed on file at the time the tax payer gave me a check for his taxes, and at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rundell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Tankersley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API