Legal Opinion
People v. Stutelberg
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided November 21, 2018No. D073266PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDato, J.
*315After a heated exchange outside a bar, defendant Nathaniel Stutelberg jabbed a box cutter at Michelle S. and Chris L., lacerating *316Michelle's head but not injuring Chris. Among other things, the jury convicted Stutelberg of mayhem with a deadly weapon enhancement as to Michelle ( Pen. Code, §§ 203, 12022, subd. (b)(1) )1 and *158assault with a deadly weapon as to Chris (§ 245, subd. (a)(1) ). The sole issue on appeal is whether erroneous jury instructions defining a "deadly weapon" require reversal of either of Stutelberg's convictions.
As to the offense against Michelle, we conclude the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. GuitonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. AledamatCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- McClain v. Kissler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Marsh, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Irene Gonzalez v. Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2023
- P. Dernigoghossian CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.