People v. Boulet
Rochester City Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlphonse L. Cassetti, J.
The above-named defendants, through their attorney, move to dismiss the charges against them in the furtherance of justice pursuant to CPL 170.30 (subd 1, par [g]) due to prosecutorial misconduct.
The facts alleged, and which are substantially undisputed, are as follows:
1. Mary Boulet, the wife of one of the defendants, was served a subpoena on June 17, 1976 about 3:00 p.m. at her apartment, commanding her to appear before a Grand Jury of Monroe County at the Hall of Justice, Rochester, New York "Forthwith” as a witness in a criminal action against Silas Murray and Douglas Curry. She was then…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. ArochoNew York Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. NatalNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Guardiola v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Rodrigues v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Drake v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- McKeon v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.