Legal Opinion

People v. Boulet

Rochester City Court

Decided October 29, 1976PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlphonse L. Cassetti, J.

The above-named defendants, through their attorney, move to dismiss the charges against them in the furtherance of justice pursuant to CPL 170.30 (subd 1, par [g]) due to prosecutorial misconduct.

The facts alleged, and which are substantially undisputed, are as follows:

1. Mary Boulet, the wife of one of the defendants, was served a subpoena on June 17, 1976 about 3:00 p.m. at her apartment, commanding her to appear before a Grand Jury of Monroe County at the Hall of Justice, Rochester, New York "Forthwith” as a witness in a criminal action against Silas Murray and Douglas Curry. She was then…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ArochoNew York Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. NatalNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Guardiola v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. Rodrigues v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Drake v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  5. McKeon v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API