Legal Opinion

Hartnett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1909No. 4035PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

RAMSEY, Judge.

The charging part of the indictment against appellant is in these words: “That Eugene Hartnett on or about the third day of March, One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eight (1908) and anterior to the presentment of this indictment in the county of Jefferson, and State of Texas, Eugene Hartnett was then and there a police officer of the incorporated city of Beaumont, which said city was then and there duly and legally incorporated under the laws of Texas, and was then and there acting and serving as such police officer, and as such police officer and by virtue of his said office there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County of San Luis Obispo v. FarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. State v. BolinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Warswick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dickey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. McMillin v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API